Religious Voters' Questions for Candidates for Public Office
The Oklahoma Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice does not endorse or oppose any candidate or political party. In publishing this guide, the Religious Coalition is neither surveying candidates nor preparing to publish their views.
Political rhetoric can blur and distort serious issues, making it difficult to know what candidates for public office really believe about reproductive health issues. It is even more difficult to know what the candidates will do once they are elected. As a religious person, you seek public officials - whether on school boards or city councils, in state legislatures or the US Congress - who will enact policies which respect each persons religious beliefs. These policies include those that respect individual decisions about whether and when to have children.
Reproductive and religious freedoms are being attacked not only in legislation that deals specifically with abortion, but also in health care and welfare reform proposals, various budget reconfigurations, and restrictions placed upon the content of sexuality education programs in the public schools. To vote your conscience, you need to be able to discern how a candidate will translate campaign rhetoric into public policy. Specifically, you want to see the enactment of public policies which affirm both religious liberty and reproductive freedom.
The Oklahoma Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice has prepared this webpage to give you a broad overview of issues which are often blurred or distorted. We are hopeful that the questions presented here will help you asses your candidates positions - whatever their political party or affiliation - on issues which are important to you.
SEXUALITY EDUCATION
School programs provide basic sexual health education and services to young people. It is important that educators be available with accurate and comprehensive information on anatomy, reproduction, pregnancy prevention, pregnancy options, and healthy relationship building.
Questions:
What are your views on comprehensive, age appropriate sexuality education?
What is your position on abstinence only programs and the use of federal and state funds to support those programs?
TEEN BIRTHRATE
Current law in Oklahoma gives minors the right to confidential health care, including routine medical care and family planning services.
Statistics recently released by the National Center for Health Statistics revealing a historic drop in the teen birth rate have sparked a debate over possible explanations for the decline. The Christian Science Monitor (8/15/00) reports, One factor cited by many is the campaign to promote abstinence among young people.
Supporters of sex education, on the other hand, point out that surveys also show more teens are using contraceptives when they make the decision to become sexually active-indicating that teaching teenagers about different forms of birth control has played a big role in reducing the number of teen births.
An editorial in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (8/11/00) agrees that the thriving US economy played a role in the teen birth rate decline: If a teenager ... believes that her future is hers to write and that the choices she makes will have a real impact on what shape that future takes, (she) will be much more open to messages of restraint and responsibility.
Question:
What is your position on confidential reproductive health services for young people?
FAMILY PLANNING
Low-income and vulnerable populations currently have access to family planning services through federal- and state-funded programs. Particularly in rural Oklahoma, women have limited options in terms of family planning services, many traveling long distances to a clinic. Opponents of family planning seek to reduce or to end public funding. Family planning is a necessity for families to stay strong and healthy and to ensure that children are born when they can be welcomed and nurtured.
Question:
What is your position on continued governmental funding for family planning services?
ACCESS TO ABORTION
Privacy
In 1973, in the historic Roe vs. Wade case, the United States Supreme Court recognized that all women have the right to be free from governmental interference in choices of whether or not to have children. The Court specified that this includes the right to make private and unhindered decisions regarding abortion.
Question:
What are your views on the 1973 Roe vs. Wade privacy ruling?
LATE-TERM ABORTION
Each year, some 650 women in the United States facing serious health risks and/or severe fetal anomalies choose to undergo a third-trimester abortion. This procedure is very rare, less than 1/10 of 1% of all abortions. Such pregnancies are most often wanted and planned, and the decision to terminate comes after much prayer and painful deliberation. Attempts to legislate bans on specific procedures limit access to abortions which are medically appropriate in certain circumstances. These proposed bans will endanger many womens health and future childbearing.
Question:
What are your views on attempts to ban specific abortion procedures?
MEDICAL ABORTION
On September 28, 2000, the FDA approved the drug, Mifepristone, formerly known as RU-486, for early medical abortions up to 49 days from last menstrual period. Their approval carried with it several restrictions, which were not as severe as first anticipated. These restrictions include limiting the availability of the drug to physicians, requiring that physicians be able to also perform surgical abortion, reporting requirements and providing a printed guide to each patient with clear instructions for the medical abortion procedure.
Question:
What are your views on the availability of medical abortion?
|