Subscribe to email newsletter
Contact Us
Contact your federal and state legislators
Contact Gov. Brad Henry
Home

THE MORNING AFTER PILL

Q. What drugs are used?

A. Ordinary birth control pills are prescribed in larger doses

Q. What happens when I use the "Morning After Pill"?

A. If taken within 72 hours after a woman has had unprotected sex, can prevent an unintended pregnancy.

Q. Are there other names for the "Morning After Pill"?

A. Yes, Emergency Contraception, often shortened to EC

Q. Do I have to have a prescription?

A. All contraception drugs are available only by prescription.

Q. Where can I get EC?

A. Call 1-888-NOT-2LATE or 1-888-668-2528

THE ABORTION PILL

Q. What drugs are used?

A. Mifepristone and Mifeprex

Q. What do these drugs do?

A. End a pregnancy if taken in the first seven to nine weeks.

Q. Are there other names for the Abortion Pill?

A. Yes, RU486, or Medical Abortion

Q. Where can I find a Doctor of Clinic near me?

A. Call 1-800-772-9100

A Reproductive Health Lexicon

Emergency Contraception (EC) is sometimes called “the morning after pill.” It has been used for many years by not often discussed or made easily available. The treatment must begin no later than 72 hours after unprotected intercourse and consists of concentrated doses of standard, low-dose oral birth control pill (see the list and recommended dosages for each brand of “the pill”). EC DOES NOT CAUSE AN ABORTION -- it prevents a pregnancy. It is also available by prescription as “Preven” and “Plan B”.
Plan B is now over the counter for those over 18. Minors still need a prescription. Those over 18 must show the pharmacist an ID proving they are over 18. Reproductive Services and Planned Parenthood sell it for $35. It is available to those using the health dept.

Link to Survey
Medical Abortion (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH EC, above). Sometimes called “RU486", or the “French Abortion Pill” has been used in other countries for many years. It is used to end an early pregnancy without surgery. Two different medications are given which cause the uterus to expel a very early embryo (approx. 49 days old, maximum). It is more expensive and takes more visits to the clinic. However, it is non-invasive, can be done at home, and requires no anesthesia.

“Partial Birth Abortion”
is a political name for a type of surgical abortion. The emotionally charged phrase is deliberately used to make abortion appear harsh, cruel and inhuman and was created in hopes that enacting a law that bans abortions described by this misleading term would effectively ban all abortions. The U.S. Supreme Court has declared as unconstitutional a Nebraska law using this phrase (Carhart vs. Steinberg).

Stem Cell Research and government funding for this research is strongly opposed by “pro-life” organizations because it is usually “embryonic stem cells” that are involved in this research, i.e., embryos are destroyed to obtain the stem cells. Most ethicists, however, recognize the promise of stem cell research in finding new treatments for life threatening diseases and that the embryos used would otherwise be destroyed or discarded as surplus.

Parental Consent is most strongly supported by the same people who oppose all legal abortion. Some pro-choice supporters also support laws that mandate that pregnant teenagers have to have their parent’s permission to have an abortion. However, it is essential to understand that the majority of young women involve a caring adult in their decision to have an abortion, and that for some young women being forced to tell their parents is dangerous and punitive. Making laws that are based on a belief that parents’ rights come first forces pregnant young women to become mothers. The absence of such laws give them the freedom to struggle with making her their own choices supported by caring adults.
Nearly all minors involve their parents but for those who feel they cannot, judicial bypass is available.

Abortion Clinic Licensing is the law in Oklahoma. There are only 3 abortion providers in Oklahoma – one in each: Oklahoma City, Norman, and Tulsa.

“Choose Life” License Plates are now legal in Oklahoma, with part of the tag fee set aside to support organizations that advocate adoption rather than abortion. This means that the only the beneficiaries are Crises Pregnancy Centers, “storefront” pro-life organizations that use coercion, intimidation and deception to keep women from choosing to have an abortion. Pro-choice and all options counseling services are ineligible for these funds.

“Abstinence Only” Sex Education for teens has been shown to be an ineffective means for reducing unwanted pregnancies and/or abortions. Studies are now showing that teens often delay sexual activity in response to “abstinence only” programs, but are not always able to sustain that commitment until marriage. When they abandon abstinence many become pregnant because they’ve had no comprehensive sexuality education and lack the information they need to protect themselves from an unwanted pregnancy (or a sexually transmitted disease). Other studies have shown that the teen abortion rate has declined in recent years in direct relation to teens’ increased knowledge about and access to of all forms of contraception.
Religious Voters' Questions for Candidates for Public Office

The Oklahoma Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice does not endorse or oppose any candidate or political party. In publishing this guide, the Religious Coalition is neither surveying candidates nor preparing to publish their views.

Political rhetoric can blur and distort serious issues, making it difficult to know what candidates for public office really believe about reproductive health issues. It is even more difficult to know what the candidates will do once they are elected. As a religious person, you seek public officials - whether on school boards or city councils, in state legislatures or the US Congress - who will enact policies which respect each person’s religious beliefs. These policies include those that respect individual decisions about whether and when to have children.

Reproductive and religious freedoms are being attacked not only in legislation that deals specifically with abortion, but also in health care and welfare reform proposals, various budget reconfigurations, and restrictions placed upon the content of sexuality education programs in the public schools. To vote your conscience, you need to be able to discern how a candidate will translate campaign rhetoric into public policy. Specifically, you want to see the enactment of public policies which affirm both religious liberty and reproductive freedom.

The Oklahoma Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice has prepared this webpage to give you a broad overview of issues which are often blurred or distorted. We are hopeful that the questions presented here will help you asses your candidates’ positions - whatever their political party or affiliation - on issues which are important to you.

SEXUALITY EDUCATION

School programs provide basic sexual health education and services to young people. It is important that educators be available with accurate and comprehensive information on anatomy, reproduction, pregnancy prevention, pregnancy options, and healthy relationship building.

Questions:
What are your views on comprehensive, age appropriate sexuality education?
What is your position on “abstinence only” programs and the use of federal and state funds to support those programs?

TEEN BIRTHRATE

Current law in Oklahoma gives minors the right to confidential health care, including routine medical care and family planning services.

Statistics recently released by the National Center for Health Statistics revealing a historic drop in the teen birth rate have sparked a debate over possible explanations for the decline. The Christian Science Monitor (8/15/00) reports, “One factor cited by many is the campaign to promote abstinence among young people. … Supporters of sex education, on the other hand, point out that surveys also show more teens are using contraceptives when they make the decision to become sexually active-indicating that teaching teenagers about different forms of birth control has played a big role in reducing the number of teen births.”

An editorial in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (8/11/00) agrees that the thriving US economy played a role in the teen birth rate decline: “If a teenager ... believes that her future is hers to write and that the choices she makes will have a real impact on what shape that future takes, (she) will be much more open to messages of restraint and responsibility.”

Question:
What is your position on confidential reproductive health services for young people?

FAMILY PLANNING

Low-income and vulnerable populations currently have access to family planning services through federal- and state-funded programs. Particularly in rural Oklahoma, women have limited options in terms of family planning services, many traveling long distances to a clinic. Opponents of family planning seek to reduce or to end public funding. Family planning is a necessity for families to stay strong and healthy and to ensure that children are born when they can be welcomed and nurtured.

Question:
What is your position on continued governmental funding for family planning services?

ACCESS TO ABORTION

Privacy
In 1973, in the historic Roe vs. Wade case, the United States Supreme Court recognized that all women have the right to be free from governmental interference in choices of whether or not to have children. The Court specified that this includes the right to make private and unhindered decisions regarding abortion.

Question:
What are your views on the 1973 Roe vs. Wade privacy ruling?

LATE-TERM ABORTION

Each year, some 650 women in the United States facing serious health risks and/or severe fetal anomalies choose to undergo a third-trimester abortion. This procedure is very rare, less than 1/10 of 1% of all abortions. Such pregnancies are most often wanted and planned, and the decision to terminate comes after much prayer and painful deliberation. Attempts to legislate bans on specific procedures limit access to abortions which are medically appropriate in certain circumstances. These proposed bans will endanger many women’s health and future childbearing.

Question:
What are your views on attempts to ban specific abortion procedures?

MEDICAL ABORTION

On September 28, 2000, the FDA approved the drug, Mifepristone, formerly known as RU-486, for early medical abortions up to 49 days from last menstrual period. Their approval carried with it several restrictions, which were not as severe as first anticipated. These restrictions include limiting the availability of the drug to physicians, requiring that physicians be able to also perform surgical abortion, reporting requirements and providing a printed guide to each patient with clear instructions for the medical abortion procedure.

Question:
What are your views on the availability of medical abortion?